Government of Jamaica


Government of Jamaica

Understanding the Complexity of Tax Arrears and Write-off System

The Hon. Nigel Clarke, D.Phil., MP
The Hon. Nigel Clarke, D.Phil., MP

Minister of Finance and the Public Service

The Restructuring of Public Sector Compensation

A country’s tax records fossilise its economic history. The chronic economic instability and turmoil that Jamaica experienced over much of the past three decades, that affected public and private sectors, and the struggles of under-resourced tax authorities to keep up, are imprinted and indelibly expressed in our tax record metadata.

As a society, we have no better choice than to attempt to understand and reckon with this historical reality even as authorities endeavour to transparently resolve the legacy consequences.

In 2011, when a policy was being developed to address the untenable issue of uncollectable tax arrears, there were 70,245 taxpayers accounting for approximately $230 billion of tax arrears. By 2013 when the proposed legislative amendments were submitted to Cabinet for approval, more than $408 billion was owed by 145,271 taxpayer accounts, which demonstrated the ballooning nature of the problem.

How tax arrears arise

Tax arrears consist of taxes, of all types, that are in the estimation of Tax Administration Jamaica (TAJ) or the Revenue Authority lawfully due and payable but that remain unpaid. Tax arrears are made up of the original principal amount of the tax due in addition to interest, penalties and surcharges added with punitive and dissuasive intent.

When public and private sector taxpayers experience severe financial duress they sometimes skip tax payments, become delinquent, thereby increasing the stock of tax arrears. There are other instances when financially stable taxpayers do not comply and are then assessed to be liable for taxation, and this adds to the volume of tax arrears outstanding. There are more egregious cases of foreigners absconding, having previously established business in Jamaica.

On other occasions, otherwise compliant taxpayers receive tax assessments that claim they are liable for more taxes than they have declared or paid. Once the due date of the tax assessment passes without payment, the stock of arrears increases. A balanced account must acknowledge that not all of what the Revenue Authority records as tax arrears arises as a result of taxpayer delinquency. It is sometimes the case that what is recorded as tax arrears by the Revenue Authority is the subject of a legitimate objection by the taxpayer. In other words, some of the inventory of tax arrears represent contested claims.

The composition of tax arrears

The stock of tax arrears declined from $403 billion in 2013 to $159 billion in 2020 on account of collection activities, write-offs of uncollectable tax arrears and lower net annual increases of new tax arrears.

The public tends to think of tax arrears as only being associated with the private sector. It would therefore probably surprise readers to learn that just under 40 per cent of current tax arrears are on account of 2,029 government sector taxpayers (state-owned enterprises, public bodies, public schools, departments, agencies, ministries, etc.) and 60 per cent of tax arrears are on account of 143,840 non-government taxpayers, including individuals, professionals, businesses, private schools and colleges, as well as NGOs. Furthermore, TAJ reports that government sector taxpayer arrears constitute, by far, the largest individual taxpayer arrear balances, with only nine government sector taxpayer arrear balances accounting for 25 per cent of the entire stock of arrears.

It is also useful to note that approximately 66 per cent (or $104 billion) of the arrears balance originates from automatically applied interest, penalties and surcharges, and 34 per cent (or $55 billion) represents the original principal tax arrears balance. That is, the original principal tax arrears balance represents about 10 per cent of annual tax revenues.

Large stock of tax arrears creates problems

A large stock of tax arrears leads to an overestimation of revenue forecasts, an overcommitment of expenditure resulting in an accumulation of debt.

A large stock of uncollectable taxpayer arrears creates even bigger problems. Prior to 2013, large numbers and amounts of taxpayer arrear balances generated mountains of discretionary waiver requests that engulfed resources. Systems for processing these requests were not rules-based and depended on ministerial discretion with the obvious governance pitfalls. Furthermore, there was no mechanism for the public to be informed of the particulars of these ministerial tax arrears write-offs.

Collectability of tax arrears

During the 2019-20 fiscal year, approximately $18 billion (or three per cent) of the revenue collected that year came from taxpayer arrears.

However, in some instances, tax arrears are uncollectable. Tax arrears may be uncollectable if the taxpayer no longer exists, is bankrupt or does not have the income or assets that could finance payment. Tax arrears may also be uncollectable if the legal basis to collect does not exist or if it is so old that the records are compromised. Also, it may be the case that the cost of collection of the arrear is not justified by the likely yield.

Despite these realities, the pre-2013 legislation allowed the Revenue Authority to indefinitely expend resources to collect tax that has been assessed even if these taxes may have become impossible or impractical to collect. There were no statutory criteria on which a tax collector could properly refrain from continuing the collection pursuit. This contributed to ballooning arrears, which, at the time, could only legally be deflated by ministerial discretion.

Tax collection reform and write-off

When the Government of Jamaica (GOJ) entered into the Extended Fund Facility with the IMF in May 2013, in addition to strengthening tax collection powers, one of the first staff-level structural benchmarks to be met by October 2013 was to achieve “…Parliamentary approval of the legislation for the introduction of a write-off policy for tax and customs duties arrears inclusive of interest, penalty and surcharge consistent with FAD advice …” (FAD is the Fiscal Affairs Department of the IMF).

The Fund immediately recognised the self-defeating nature of perpetually carrying a large stock of uncollectable tax arrears and the weakness in tax administration legislation that did not provide the avenue for uncollectable tax arrears to be transparently written off.

The solution, by way of new legislation, included:

(i) abolishing the discretionary power of the minister to grant waivers in relation to tax arrears matters;

(ii) amending the Tax Collection Act to introduce a rules-based procedure for the commissioner general of tax to determine a tax arrear as uncollectable;

(iii) introducing the Tax Collection (Write-off) Regulations 2013 that prescribe the specific circumstances under which the commissioner general can determine a tax arrear as uncollectable;

(iv) including in those regulations the circumstances where the commissioner general is prohibited from determining an arrear as uncollectable;

(v) requiring that taxpayer write-off determinations made by the commissioner general are made public through an order signed by the minister and published in the Gazette;

(vi) giving the commissioner general the power to recover the debt written off in the future if any information becomes available to the commissioner general that the sum can in fact be collected.

To operationalise this process, the commissioner general relies on a Tax Write-Off Committee of senior GOJ tax officials, chaired by a non-TAJ member, who meet monthly to consider the commissioner general’s recommendations. Unanimous agreement that each case meets the criteria set out in the regulations is required before the commissioner general makes the write-off determination.

Operation ‘Broad Brush’

However, the problem of uncollectable tax arrears was so acutely, densely and intractably complicated that the case-by-case approach was insufficient to resolve the problem. A brute-force approach was also necessary.

To clean up the tax ledger the regulations include a provision that allows for non-government tax arrears as at December 31, 2010 and for public body tax arrears as at December 31, 2012 to be written off in a ‘Broad-Brush approach’ (the actual name of the project). The ‘Broad-Brush’ approach bypasses the specific circumstances-based criteria in Section 5(1)a of the regulations and uses a cut-off date criteria as per Section 5(1)b of the regulations. The basis of the ‘Broad-Brush approach’ is the impracticability of collection of these tax arrears. This was the only practical approach given the scale of the problem.

Under this ‘Broad-Brush approach’, more than $250 billion in tax arrears were written off in 2014 and 2015 in batches. Totals were published in the Gazette but neither government nor non-government taxpayers were itemised as it was deemed impractical to do so. Listing each ‘Broad Brush’ taxpayer arrears write-off would easily exhaust 10,000 pages.

Further transparency is necessary

The practice of not itemising individual ‘Broad Brush’ taxpayer arrears write-offs in the Gazette on account of the practical challenges of volume continued beyond 2015 with some exceptions. Many will see this as a shortcoming. By virtue of the aggregate size of the ‘Broad Brush’ write-offs, there is a legitimate public interest in this information being available.

I am using this medium to indicate that we will address this shortcoming. As soon as practicable, the commissioner general of tax will make disaggregated information available on ‘Broad Brush’ taxpayer write-offs from 2014 in hard copies available at the TAJ and the Ministry of Finance (MOF). This information will also be available in electronic form on the TAJ and MOF websites.

The way forward

Since passage of the legislation in 2013, more than $288 billion of uncollectable taxpayer arrears have been written off.

Going forward with the reforms pledged in my letter to The Gleaner last Friday and the further reforms committed to in this article, we will continue to strengthen the transparency of the tax arrears write-off system.

Published in the Gleaner – Oct 4, 2020

Dr Nigel Clarke is Minister of Finance and the Public Service and Member of Parliament for St Andrew Northwestern.  Send feedback to opedjamaica@gmail.com.

The Hon. Nigel Clarke, D.Phil., MP

Minister of Finance and the Public Service
30 National Heroes Circle, Kingston 4
Tel: (876) 932-4656 / 4660 / 4655
Eml: opedjamaica@gmail.com

Leave a Reply

Stay up to date.

Sign up our newsletter for latest articles and news.

Stay up to date.

Sign up our newsletter for latest articles and news.

More Than USD 1.7 Trillion In Public Procurement Opportunities Available Through Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO GPA

Philippe Pelletier, Legal Affairs Officer at the World Trade Organization (WTO) has announced that USD 1.7 Trillion in value of the market access is available annually under the WTO Government Procurement Agreement (GPA). He was speaking during the second day of the Elevate Procurement Conference which is being held at the Montego Bay Convention Centre from April 23-25, 2024.

Read More »

Jamaica, International Financial Institutions, Donors Collaborate on Establishing a Programmatic Approach to Finance Climate Needs

The Government of Jamaica (GOJ), the Development Bank of Jamaica, the Green Climate Fund (GCF), Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), the World Bank Group, European Investment Bank as part of Team Europe, USAID, and the United Kingdom, are discussing a framework to establish a ‘Blue Green Facility’ –a blended financing structure–of up to USD 500 million over five years, which would include a contribution from the Government of Jamaica. Such a programmatic approach will help catalyze climate finance by introducing systematic, coherent, and scalable approaches towards adaptation and mitigation needs.

Read More »

Consolidated Update on SSL

The fraud at Stocks and Securities Limited (“SSL”) is of public interest. The Financial Investigation Division has reported that the fraudulent schemes are now estimated to have
affected over 200 accounts and the extent of the fraud exceeds $3 billion in value.

Read More »

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.